Saturday, March 29, 2008

Discussion: The Contenders

Welcome everybody to a new discussion post. Rusty is back!. This one in particulary will address the question of who are the real contender for this year tittle and who might be the last team standing. We are not even trying to predict the West but we'll discuss it. Enjoy



Morgan: We'll start with the East. The top seed, the Celtics. How 'bout this guys?





Rusty: Definitely a contender and they are my favorites to win the Eastern Conference. The only thing that could derrail this team is a major injury to any of their so called Big Three.

M: Well yeah. Any team that suffers an injury to any of their top three players will be on trouble.Boston Celtics I'm with you they are the team to beat in the East but they haven't face any real pressure they came out blazing of the gates and they have been the number one team since then. They are a veteran team and the leadership is clearly there but it could interesting to see this team's response to adversity in a critical game.

R: Also they are not that deep. If Garnett or Pierce miss considerable time against the Pistons or whoever cames out of the West this team can't replace their production. No for more than a couple of games.

M: Do you trust Doc Rivers?

R: I hope that at this point he has his team figured it out.Don't you think?

M: Yeah, but do you trust him?

R: I trust his trust on his veteran players


M: Now the Pistons. They always need to feel disrespected to play their best ball. Boston's success may give him that fire.
Detroit Pistons
R: That's being their "mojo" from day 1. They also have that chip in the shoulder for being eliminated by a one man team last season. For my money, they are the best Pistons team since winning the championship in 2004.

M: They are a lock to reach the Conference Finals. Now, can Boston survive the one man team?

R: Everybody saw what Lebron James did to the Pistons and everybody saw what the Spurs did to James. Boston is a better defensive team that the Detroit Pistons a year ago they won't let James take over the entire series. The Cavaliers could win a game or two.

M: Well, now argue there. You get the feeling that KG is going to will his way to the conference finals. Wrapping up the East, Boston or Detroit?

R: The Boston Celtics specially if the Lakers reach the Western conference Finals. The league won't let a Lakers- Celtics finals slip away.


M: I'm impress, you have change Rusty! This will be a great seven game series and most of the games will come down to the final play specially with two defensive oriented teams. Given that Detroit have more "clutch" players I'm given this series to the Pistons

R: If it comes to the last shot Detroit does have a better chance to represent the East in the NBA Finals

M: Well this part went rather smoodly -more smooth that I'd want for a discussion post- Let's go to the fun part: the West. Your number one contender, Rusty?



San Antonio Spurs
R: I'm a old school guy so I'm going to the old school team: the San Antonio Spurs. They are the most solid team , they have the experience and for whatever reason they always have that lucky bounce of the ball going their way

M: I'm torn between the top three teams: Spurs, Lakers and Hornets. San Antonio have everything that you just said and also I'm waiting for the chance for Manu to take over this playoffs. If that happens and the Spurs won by the hand of Manu will be the best story for this team.

For the Lakers I'm also looking forward to see how Kobe response to the level of play in the West. If he and Bynum and Gasol are healthy they are the favorites in my book. But that's a big if. The Hornets will make noise, somehow. They can compete with anybody their only weakness is that their shooters are rather streaky but when you have a point guard like Chris Paul anything can happen.


Los Angeles Lakers
R: Apparently Bynum will be back but I don't think he will be in shape to handle the bigs in the West, whatever the matchups are. The Lakers are a great team but if they run into the Spurs their run will be over... UNLESS... they league decides otherwise

M: You are pushing that in every line. Come on, come clean...

R: What?

M: A'right. Do you think the league is fixing the playoffs?

R: No, Morgan. I'll never say that. It will be very stupid for this league to go out and fix the outcome of the entire championship.There's a huge difference between fixing the all tournament and helping or giving a team a better shot at winning a game. That's what the NBA does

M: I just did a little homework for you. Here and here.
I don't know if the Lakers' chances are ridding in Bynum's shoulders. Gasol is a pretty good matchup against any big he can't defend but he's there, catch my drift?. Besides offensively he's a handful.

R: Yeah, but defense wins playoff games. They are still a good defensive team but if other team goes on a isolation against Gasol over and over again they could be in trouble

M: That's unlukely.There's help defense, you know?

R: There's open three point shooter, you know?

M: Fine, Fine. How about the Hornets?

R: I love Chris Paul. He's been the best point guard hands down. West and Chandler are having great season thanks to Paul at some degree. My only concern with this team is what happen whe defensive schemes take West and Chandler out of the game or at least keeping them in check. Would Paul brings them back?

M: That's also my issue with this guys, sort of. Can they survive the playoffs and everything that comes along? Is Paul that good?

R: Right now, he's not. They can defeat younger teams like Utah, Denver or Golden State. Their road ends in San Antonio or LA

M:Who else is a contender here?

R: Everybody in the top seven

M:For my own appreciation if Utah can handle their way on the road in a more consistent way they can also be a contender. Williams and Boozer are just too good, they have the shooters, they have the defense and they ceitanly have the coach

R: Utah is going to start on the road if the loose both games is over for them.

M: They are tough enough to recover from that, they bounced back last year against the Rockets even winning game 7 at Houston. I know is all about the matchups but it is easier for them to win in the road that the other team winning at Utah.

R: They will need to drow a mentally softer team like Dallas or Houston. Even there is Tracy McGrady or Josh Howard or any fast swing player have a GREAT series they can't matchup. Kirilenko and their entire team defense has taken a step back.

M: I don't think Utah can be discarded that easily. DWill and Boozer bring it night in and night out. Every single night

R: Then explain me their road record

M: The other guys don't follow the trend

R: Exactly! This is a team sport. They can't win with just two guy playing their heart out. Maybe against a team with a weaker "fire" but no against a hungry team where everybody pulls for one goal

M: Man, that was poetic!. You mention the Mavs as a good matchup for Utah. Are they even going to be there?



R: Dallas is not a good matchup for anybody not if Nowitzki comes backDallas Maverics healthy. I need to believe this guys can win with a point guard like Jason Kidd. If they are left behind there's something wrong on the team and I'll point my finger to Nowitzki
M: Not to Avery?

R: Do you believe all the talk about "overcoaching" ?

M: I believe that this team is not build to take advantage of Kidd's skills. He's a great leader and that's always welcome but where he's great is at running the fast break and this is not a running team. They are not going to trade Nowitzki they'll better trade Kidd for a point guar who can shoot.

R: This is Nowitzki's team- actually is Cuban's first and Avery's Second - but Dirk Nowitzki is the leader on paper and he needs to step up. He has to be the guy who goes to his coach and said that things need to change, set plays need to change. His voice has to be heard

M: That's a good point by I still think that even with a healthy Nowitzki they will be out in the first round

R: If Dirk Nowitzki is healthy they can advance. I'm insist it's all about matchups

M: We still haven't talk about two similiar teams: Nuggets and Warriors. High ofensive teams featuring powerful scorers but they ain't that great at stopping the other team. Denver can be very, very dangerous. Specially now that KMart has his bounce back as he gives them a solid third option and another great defender near the basket. If they get a great stretch from KMart and Camby this team is a contender.

R: You convinced me rather quickly there! I agree with the Denver statement they could be very well a contender this year. They have one of the best starting lineups a decent bench and defensive big guys. Their minus are that they aren't commited to defense and their chemistry could improve. I don't think they could win it all but they are a dangerous team and they just need a good run which they are perfectly capable of doing

M: There a five great defensive teams right now in contention (Spurs, Lakers, Rockets, Pistons and Celtics) and you could make the case for Phoenix. Denver push ends as soon as they face any of those teams. As for the Warriors, let me tell you I've seen some 5 o 6 Warriors' games in the past month and their worst enemy is themselves. Is not only that they don't defend and their most played setplay is "RUN". They take shots that would shock you, seriously, and that's how Nellieball is played but they go into stretches where they can't buy a basket and that's when they lost everything. There's no difference between the Warriors leading by 20 and the Warriors loosing by 10


R: Well you look for the consistency in your team, Morgan. Take a look a the Spurs. There's no difference between the Spurs leading by 20 and the Spurs loosing by 10. You live and die by your style of play. What doesn't work for Golden State is that theirs is so frentic that sometimes, as you said, it works against them
Houston Rockets


M:22 straight wins and we haven't talk about them. I say Houston goes as far as McGrady takes them and if history taught us anything...

R: You write it quite accurate in a previus post. Their role players specially Rafer Alston played the best basketball of their careers during that streak. I don't see that happening again in the playoffs

M: They still are a good defensive team and you know what people say "defense wins championships"

R: They still would need some offense to back it up.
M: Good point. And some heart and desire will be nice

R: That would be swell!

M: Swell? WTF?

R: I thought you will like that

M: Yeah, it made my day.....Last but no least. Shaquille O'neal and the Phoenix Suns. If they keep playing the way they are right now they become my second pick to get out of the West. Shaq is playing decent ball, Amare is unstoppable and amazingly Nash is the one who, when they had that 1 -6 stretch or something, was the "weakest link" but now his playing at the level he's used to perform

R: Nash is not as good as a previous years by just a little bit. All the role players are playing subpars season in comparision with last year specially Leandro Barbosa. They seem a little bit in the same boat as the Denver Nuggets but with a stronguer psique. They have big guys that can't prevent penetrations - although not as good as Martin and Camby in Denver - and they have a high scoring mentality. This is the hardest team for me to read because the line between being a contender and being out in the first round is so thin for them.

M: Grant Hill is the key for them. If he's able to give them a little bit of what Marion gave them specially defense to stop the array of wing players in the West they have a shot. If Manu, Deron Williams, Kobe, TMac, Paul,Melo ,etc. start getting in the paint and putting Amare and Shaq in fou trouble that's it for them. As you said, they don't longer had the 3 point assault to take them out of trouble.

R: With the trade they gain more control of the boards. That added to Steve Nash gives them control of the flow of the game that's huge in the playoffs. But they lost that defensive advantage Marion gave them that covered for Nash and Stoudemire defensive shortcomings. Once again it depends on the matchups

To wrap it out, who do think is going to end up as the 9th team?

M: Golden State. They are playing at at .500 level right now. Not enough in the West

R: Well, I think it will be Denver but that's just a gut feeling.



There you have, a little bit long but with lot's of "sustance". I hope you guys enjoy reading it


Bill Simmons for Bucks' GM

I'm fully supporting this campaing. Bill Simmons must the next Bucks' GM. Why? I don't know I love the guy's writting, but that ain't nothing to do with basketball. But you know what, that book of " behind-the-scenes book about being an NBA GM" will be priceless

I will use all my media power to make this happen. The Basketball Gods' are behind you Simmons.

CWebb

Chris Webber



As Bill Simmons said, CWebb career will be remember for what it could be. Webber won't be remember as one of the all time greats, he had all the tools to be but he isn't. Webber was a special talent with a great pair of soft hands, excellente passing skills and good basketball IQ, that's it.

What did affect this guy, what keep this guy from becoming one of the great one.

You could say that Webber was everything but a clutch player, actually you could see him running away from the ball in the clutch on those Kings-Lakers series. He looked scared at some points of those series, not quite what you want from your team leader.

Webber was so athletic in his early days and he always had those amazing passing skills. Later he developed a smooth elbow jumper but he never was a true back to the basket type of player, he didn't had much of a post up game, and that take away a lot from what he could do in the basketball court once he got old and injured

But the main reason of how we remember CWebb is because he never wanted it enough. He never took his game or his attitude to the next step where he said "I'm going to win this game no matter what" . You look to the eyes of MJ, Kobe, Iverson, Duncan in any playoff game and you can see the determination, the hunger. You didn't see that in CWebb.


Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Basketball Gods' Eastern March

You can't call it madness in the East, right?


Celtics
March: 4 - 3
Record: 57 - 16

Consistency, Consistency, Pistons
March: 5 - 2
Record: 53 - 20

Magic
March: 2 -3
Record: 47 - 27


Cavs
March: 3 -3
Record: 41 - 33


Raptors
March: 4 - 3
Record: 38 - 36


7 of the next 9 games are in the road, Wizards
March: 4 - 4
Record: 37 - 37

Up coming games against Celtics, Pistons and Cavs, Sixers
March: 2 - 5
Record: 35 - 39

Hawks:
March: 4 - 3
Record: 33 - 41

Nets
March: 3 -5
Record: 31 - 43

Bulls:
March: 4 -3
Record: 30 -43

Pacers
March: 2 -5
Record: 28 -46


End of March stadings:

Basketball Gods' March Madness

After last trade deadline bonanza the Basketball Gods' standings predictions went to the crapper they are so benevolent with us that they are willing to give us their predictions for the second half of March for the madness in the West and those curious Leastern teams

It's cooling off time for the Rockets:
March: 4 - 3
Record: 50 - 23

Hornets:
March: 3 - 3
Record: 48 - 24

Lakers:
March: 6- 2
Record: 51 - 23

Lots of home games for Utah:
March: 6- 0
Record: 51- 24

Suns:
March: 2 - 6
Record: 44 - 28

They need a good stretch here - and they know it - Spurs:
March: 6 - 1
Record: 50 - 24

Dallas:
March: 4 - 3
Record: 48 - 26

Every single game left in March is against the West, Warriors:
March: 3 - 4
Record: 44- 28

Five game trip in six days, Nuggets:
March: 2 - 6
Record: 42 - 32


This gives us this standings:



Monday, March 17, 2008

What a weekend!


No, I wasn't kidnapped by aliens but lot's of intersting stuff went down in that crazy NBA


Rafer Alston
The winning streak reached 22 thanks to Rafer Alston and his insane shooting. Pau Gasol being injured also helped. They are now the number one team in the West and after watching the game against the Lakers I still don't believe in these guys. Credit were is due, they are a great passing team, they are a hell of a defensive team specially with Mutombo in the court and they have a bunch of shooters. That's a recipe for a championship, right? Well maybe it is and I do think they can make some noice in the playoffs.

I can't say I believe this team can win a championship because their current winning streak doesn't really tell us how good they are. It is pretty much based on momentum. Look, Rafer Alston can only shoot like that for so long. Mike Harris can't be that productive for the rest of the season. Chuck Hayes is not that good. But right now, they are unstoppable . They are ridding a huge wave of confidence and until the bubble bursts whe are going to see the real Houston Rockets.

TOny Parker


I'm really worry about the Spurs. They have a really hard schedule and in that -ridiculous close, hypercompetitive, absurbly tough- Western Conference you can't aford to have a bad weekend and that was what happened to the Spurs, at friday night they have a half game lead over the Lakers for the top seed now they woke up this morning as a 6th seed 2 games behind the streaking Rockets. They can't defeat athletic teams (Warriors, Hornets) and they have problems closing out games against top teir teams ( they lost to Detroit and Phoenix recently). I know they are the Spurs and they always find a way to close up the season with a good seed but somehow I think their moment is gone. I don't why but I just hope I'm wrong in this one.

Allen Iverson


The Nuggets put out 168 points against the Sonics. This tell me two things: First, tanking 2008 has oficially started and those Nuggets could make things interesting -as if wasn't intersting enough alredy - if they get in some kind of groove. Can you imagine the Spurs or the Suns out of the playoffs because of a 10 or something winnning streak by the Nuggets. It can happen.


Meanwhile in the East a 35 or less win team is going to be in the playoffs. Yeap, Mr Stern, no change needed here. -- Sarcarm --


Thursday, March 13, 2008

20-0

Althought I'm not entirely sold with Houston's chances of a championship, I'm very impress with their streak. You have to. Is pretty difficult to win 10 straight games in this league, not to mention 20.

What had happened since the last time Houston lost a game:

  • Miami has lost 17 games.
  • Lebron James has scored 784 points
  • Dwight Howard has produced 17 double doubles
  • The New Orleans Hornets were the number 1 team in the West. They had a 3 game lead over the Lakers
  • 11 Trades went down
  • 2 Bulls players have skipped practice
  • New York used to have a Governer
  • Britney had custody of her children.
  • I have written 15 posts

Don't want to be a "party pooper" (sorry to everyone for usings that. I think I just lost a couple readers... they'll be back, I know it) and I love to watch history happening but does anybody think this team has a shot against the Spurs or Lakers in a 7 game series. Without Yao? Anybody?

Sunday, March 9, 2008

Guide to the Casual NBA Fan

This is the second part of this post, this one is meant for the casual fan. This is the first one

Here we go


1. MJ is gone. Do the league need somebody to take his place?

Basketball Gods: Yes MJ is gone. The league has spent more than 8 years recovering from that. Once the league hit the "mainstream" - popularity wise - in the 80's they haven't face a challengue like that. When Bird and Magic retired there was MJ. When MJ went to swing bad pitches the league had Penny and Shaq, Malone and Stockton and the Knicks. They hold the fort for those couple of years. When he left in 1998 (he wasn't the same when he played for the Wizards) all those personalities and high profile players felt short of taking MJ's torch and the league suddenly didnt't know how to sell itself and everybody had this "I miss the 90's" type of feeling.

In some way the league is still looking for MJ's replacemente but in a diferent way: no more it's waiting for the next high scoring charismatic shooting guard, now we are just waiting for the next dominant force.


2. Is Tim Duncan overrated?

Basketball Gods: You know last year I was asking myselft that very same question. There are several factors going agains Tim Duncan: First, he plays in San Antonio, Texas. Second, Tim Duncan is a quiet and introvert individual. Third, his game is no flashy, is fundamental as hell. Add all those things together and it's pretty hard to sell the guy to the average fan. Another factor is that he's not a clutch player, he's a post up player. Is quiet difficult to have a post player taking the last shot of the game.

Taking all that in considerations, the guy is as good as they come. His defense one on one, his team defense, his rebouding, he demands a double team every time he touches the ball because of his array of post up moves makes him a 30 point game waiting to happen if single coveraged. His game make the game of Tony Parker and Manu Ginobilig happen. He makes the Spurs happen.

So, no he's not overrated. His game isn't easy to the eye,that's it.


3. Why there are a more good teams in the West than in the East?


Basketball Gods: Again, there's a bunch of factors. Luck, good management and CAP management are the main reasons. Luck because the have won the lottery or they have high draft picks and they have been able to select the right players. They have scouted and found hidden gems with low draft picks or in the second round. Let me explained you with examples:

  • Duncan was the first pick in 1997. Philly (East) took Keith Van Horn with the 2nd pick while Tracy McGrady and Chauncey Billups were available.
  • In1998 Dallas picked Dirk Nowitzki with the 9th pick. Same spot that Phoenix found Shawn Marion the next year.
  • In 1999 Ginobili was drafted with 57th pick..that's in the second round!
  • In 2001 Washington (East) won the lottery and select Kwame Brown (and total bust so far). Memphis traded for Pau Gasol, selected 3rd and Portland grabbed Zach Randolph with the 19th pick.

I'm not saying all East teams draft bad and all the West teams are genius, that's why I say there's a little of luck involve. Good CAPmanagement also comes to the table. Take Phoenix as an example, they traded Mardbury and Penny Hardaway to the Knicks (East) to have enough money to offer to Steve Nash. With Nash the Suns have won an average of 59 games per season. The Spurs have signed Parker, Ginobili and Duncan for long terms contracts but still have room to make key adquisitions like Michael Finley year in and year out and make trades without going over the CAP

Smart people are sucessful no matter what business are they in.


4. The Knicks have sucked for awhile now. What's the deal?

Basketball Gods: Isiah Thomas. Worst GM in the history of that franchise ...by a long shot. They also have an owner, James Dolan, that doesn't really care about the basketball side of the franchise. According to Forbes the Knicks are still the most valuable NBA franchise despite that they haven't won a playoff series in 9 years and they haven't even qualified to the last four years.


5. I heard the Bulls were winning again. Can they win it all?

Basketball Gods: Three years ago a young and scrappy Bulls team took everybody by surprise and won 47 games (out of 82) . They did it with defense and outworking pretty much everybody night in a night out. They have a couple of good years after that even going to the second round of the playoffs last year. But this team lacks 2 major components necessary for winning in these league: a post up player and a superstar that takes control when game is on the line.

The Bulls are fill with young talented players. Their names pop up almost every year in trade rumors in exchange for a big name post up player (Garnett, Gasol, Jermaine O'neal) but management had never pull the trigger. Now this team looks tired and frustrated despite being the younger team in the league and their record is showing it (25-38 as this morning). There's still a chance of salvating this Bulls but if history have taught us something this management group, lead by ex player John Paxson, won't be capable of doing it.


6. Vince Carter. He looked as the next big thing! Why I haven't heard anything from him?

Basketball Gods: Carter is probably one of the most talented and gifted athletes in the league. His problem: work ethic. Plain and simple. Vince has never been the hard working type of guy it shows in his game , it shows in his body and his teammates know this. He could be as good as Kobe if he had that same work ethic. As a fan, I think we could had something special.


7. Is the Chinese giant that good?

Basketball Gods: I guess you are talking about Yao Ming. Yes, he's that good. For the last two or three years he's been a top three center in the league.


8. Which foreign players are better between latin americans or europeans?

Basketball Gods: In general terms: europeans. They have more fundamentals, better shooters and have shown a lot more discipline that latins. If you change that question and ask me how's better between argentinians and europeans, I'll have to say argentinians. I just feel they are smarter, more blue collar and most important they are way more team oriented.


9. Give me a reason to go back

Basketball Gods: You'll be a little harder to convince that the Ex NBA fan becuase you have an idea of what's happening. What I can say is that there is more real talent right now that in recent years. There are more competitive teams. The competition is harder.

But my strongest allegation here has a name: Lebron James. This guy is too damn good. You can look in this blog for information about him or the web ( there's a google box on your right :) ) or whatever. This guy is 23 years old, has been in the league since age 17. He's 6'9 , 260 (something like Karl Malone) , he's fast, strong, excellent court vision and can fly with the best of them. Has a career average of 27.3. Lead a crappy Cleveland team to the NBA Finals las June. Just look him up.

Remember how MJ surpassed Magic, Bird. This guy will surpass MJ. I think you might wanna be witness of that.



Friday, March 7, 2008

Linkin Friday X

The best of the best in the blogging department (at least for me):


  • Pretty talented guy making his second appearence on Linkin Friday: Ryan Parker
  • Mark Cuban. You might not like the guy but he's as smart as they come
  • I just find this. To bad he's done with it.


Not a link to a blog but still well deserving of the mention:


"I'm fucking Matt Damon". Jimmy Kimmel response was even better

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Guide to the Ex NBA Fan

Since I'm considering myselft a blogger these day, don't know really why 'casuse nobody reades this blog (yeah...It's too early I'm being a little dramatic here ), a lot of friends ask me things , sometimes mindblowing, about the state of the league and some random stuff.


I have three types of persons :

  1. The Ex NBA Fan: This person gave up on the NBA when Jordan retired. Really, my generation grew watching MJ and Scottie collecting rings. When MJ left - for the second time - most of them stop following the league and from time to time read a headline like "3-Peat. Another Laker dinasty", "Carmelo or Lebron", "Shaquille Traded", "Riley, Heat won in 6 ", "Shaquille Traded". Stuff like that. They have lost track of the league but once they were avid fans.
  2. The Casual NBA Fan: They know what's happening. They know Lebron. They know Duncan and Iverson. They know Karl Malone retired years ago. They even know that the west is better than the east. But they knowledge is limited to what they actually read on the local newspaper ( where probably the person writting the NBA notes is the same who writes about beisball, NFL, Champions Cup and water polo). When this person is bored and is surfing tru the channels and finds a NBA Game, he or she would maybe watch it.... if the game is in the fourth quater
  3. The Real NBA Fan: One that ask me questions that I can answer. Example "Are the CAP limitations ruinning the grow of young teams?". I hate those guys.


Well this guide is for the second and first type of followers. If you think some of this questions are stupid you're probably a type two fan and you want to read the next post. If you think all questions are dumb, you are level 3 fan and I can't help you.






1. Is Shaquille O'neal still playing? Is he inmortal?

Basketball Gods: Yes, Shaq is still playing. No, he's not inmortal. He was drafted in 1993 at the age of 20. He's now 35 years old and for the last couple of years he's been declining, meaning he's not as good as he was


2. Are the Lakers the champions?

Basketball Gods: No, the current champions are the San Antonio Spurs. The last championship of the Lakers came in 2002 with Shaquille O'neal and Kobe Bryant leading them. This current season they have a pretty good team with a good chance of contending.


3. Are the Bulls good again?

Basketball Gods: No. The Bulls were good for a couple of years but thanks to a bad GM ( John Paxon, you might remember him from the Jordan - Barkley finals. He was the white guy the made the winning basket. Yes, he is the General Manager know) they suck right now


4. What about the Celtics?

Basketball Gods: The Celtics are good again. They got a couple of strong players in the summer through trades, including Kevin Garnett, and they have been playing fairly good this season. And no, they haven't win any championships since the last time you checked.


5. Is there any team out there dominating and winning every championship?

Basketball Gods: Since the Bulls last title in 1998 the Lakers won 3 straight at some point and the Spurs have won 4 times. Those are the only repeatears but there's not quite a dominating team though


6. Is Muggsy Bogues still playing?

Basketball Gods: No. His last stop was in 2001 in the Canadian city of Toronto


7. How are the Canadian franchises doing?

Basketball Gods: Well, one of them (Grizzlies) moved to Memphis. The Raptors are still in Toronto. They'd had good times and bad time, mostly bad, but now they are a regular in the playoffs.


8. Who's the next Michael Jordan? The Kobe kid?

Basketball Gods: Good question. Kobe Bryant and Lebron James are right now the most popular characters and two of the best players in the league. Kobe is 29 years old and have won 3 titles with the Lakers. Lebron is only 23 years old but he's mighty good. Kobe lacks the charisma MJ had .The jury still in for Lebron






9. What happened to Rodman?

Basketball Gods: Since the year 2000 he has been out of the league. I think he's still alive


10. Olajuwon ? David Robinson? Mutombo?

Basketball Gods: Retired.Retired. Playing at the age of 42.


11. Is Pat Riley still coaching?


Basketball Gods: Define "coaching"


12. What about Phil Jackson?

Basketball Gods: He's coaching the Lakers. Still one of the best coaches in the league.


13. Give me one reason to go back


Basketball Gods: First let me congratulate you for missing an dark age in the league that expaned since the retiring of MJ to last year. Second, if you had ask me that question a year ago there was no way I could convince you of coming back because, althought I was following the league closely, it didn't had any appeal to the casual fan. But now there's a new generation of really, really good players and the league is fill with a new brand of basketball and competitiveness, thanks in good part of all the European an Latin talent that reached the league in the last 10 years.


The biggest improvement of all is that for the first time in years nobody is trying to be like Mike. The league has learned that they have players and organizations that can carry the league without looking back to the 90's. That's huge. It really is. You left when Vince Carter was being tagged as the next Mike. Kobe talked like Mike. There's no more "like Mike" stuff.

You might also saw a crappy 1999 Knicks team reach the NBA Finals. Eventhough I can't say to you that something like that won't happen again, what I can say without fear of being wrong is that there are a greater number of good talented teams these days. Games are just more entertaiment and fun to watch.


Give it a go you might ended yo surprise





Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Recruiting in the retirement home

Sam Cassell


38 year old Sam Cassell and 38 year old P.J. Brown are the reinforces for the Boston's playoff push. I know the title have like a negative vibe but I actually like those guys. They bring defense and "timing offense". With that I mean that they can nail a jumper, a tip-in, a three here and there and contribuite with the offensive cause.


They have been brought for their possible matchup with the Pistons. On paper, they are good "part time counterparts" but I seriously doubt they can keep with Billups, 'Sheed and McDyess during a 7 game series.


Again, with this I'm not saying that Boston will lost against the Pistons in a eventual playoff matchup. I'm just saying that PJ and Sam I Am won't make any MAJOR difference


Algo, San Antonio will get Brent Barry back.


The Suns signed Gordan Giricek and the Pistons signed Theo Ratliff.